I'll take restricted access, well managed, private lease arrangements any day over the overcrowded, overhunted public land draw hunts I've done.
+1
So many, who for generations hunted timber company land here locally, were really pizzed when the companies discovered hunting lease revenue. Some of those birthright "nesters" became violent, burned vehicles, camps, etc.
Those who pay the taxes, own the land should have some say, should be able to receive benefits from that ownership. Free stuff only exists in Dem. political speak...
As populations grow, demand for hunting space can't keep up without game management, hunting property management, etc. And, that costs money.
Out in the great open spaces, maybe not as critical. In more populated areas, that's just a reality and the way it's gotta be.
DF
