But, I can't get behind an organization that is propped up by known enemies.
No one is asking you to get behind them. Just deal in facts when you're talking about them instead of innuendo and quotes from the likes of the "Liberty News."
So, can anyone come forward to deny that the funds mentioned in that link came from the sources mentioned?
Whenever these discussions come up, the underlying common denominator seems to be that BHA has ties to radical environmentalists that we all know have done everything they can to do away with the MUA, and take more public lands to create more parks, wilderness areas, and other areas where more regulation and less access to the general public for hunting and other things guaranteed by the MUA.
