Originally Posted by Wannabebwana
Originally Posted by Jcubed
Originally Posted by Wannabebwana
If you are intent on catching the dirty actors in politics, the absolute worst way to do it is to tell them they're being recorded and/or give them the option of a choice. You think they're stupid?


Why?

You could have rooted them out before you and Svevlanka ever became a thing...

WTF does that even mean?


Originally Posted by Jcubed
Originally Posted by Steve
Okay, let's get back to the point.

The head of the Republican party in AZ was trying to bribe Kari Lake not to run. Lake has incontrovertible proof of it.

What is the opinion of the fire on this matter and how will it all play out.

(and please for the love of all that's good don't get hung up on my use of the word 'incontrovertible'.)


Unless she told him she was recording, she has nothing...

Per the state laws of az.



It is literally a wag the dog moment.



But I'm not a JD

Single party state means that only one person has to know the conversation is being recorded - that would be Kari Lake. What she did was perfectly legal and useful in a court of law, so long as they can identify the second party.


Good for her.