Originally Posted by Valsdad
Originally Posted by Jcubed
Originally Posted by Valsdad
Originally Posted by Jcubed
Originally Posted by Steve
Does it matter? Az is a one party consent state.

Do you think he would have had the conversation if he knew he was going to be recorded? He didn't even want to have the conversation over the phone.

Dude stepped on his dick. Be interesting if he faces any consequences or just gets promoted into a beltway job.


Yes, it matters, Hillary.

Az has laws.


Seems Steve has it right. One party consent

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=AZ+law+on+recording+conversations&ia=web


What does that mean?

So, when the "Rs" were in charge it was cool?
no, it's never been cool to offer bribes to stop a candidate.

not sure if it's ever been cool to record a conversation with only the one party knowing about it, but that is the reality in some jurisdictions. In others it may be illegal or at least inadmissible in legal proceedings.

pretty easy it would seem, in those areas where it's allowed, for it to be abused by setting someone up to be entrapped.
How would recording a f ucking criminal doing criminal things be an issue exactly?