Does anyone really think the old man who owned the land needed killing? I'd be really surprised if this could not have had a different outcome with a different approach. Leaving and coming back or any number of variations might have preserved the man's life, and that is should be the most important thing. Saddly, law, and the convenience and deference to it's stewards, appears more important than life.
We may know the time Ben Carson lied, but does anyone know the time Hillary Clinton told the truth?
Immersing oneself in progressive lieberalism is no different than bathing in the sewage of Hell.
