OldRemmington;
I guess everything is open to interpretation and I'll admit to some bias since I'm a Field Editor for G&A. But I still feel the Editor was only commenting because the hunter said he chose the "cheapest thing in the store" not because he was shooting Core Lokts. I'll also note, it was not an article. It was the Editor's monthly Editorial where he discusses what is in this months issue. The story of the price conscious hunter was a natural lead in to the article on Federals new bullets because they, reportedly, deliver bonded bullet performance at prices comparable to standard bullets.
Is it possible, you being a staunch Remington fan, you read more into the comments than was intended?
