Originally Posted by UNCCGrad
Originally Posted by Fotis
All I can say is 9mm ball of any kind sucks in combat where it is required (military)

Now the newer critical defense/duty stuff (and more) which civilians can carry bring it to a whole new level.


Is there something in the Geneva Convention that does not allow flat pointed ball FMJ ammo? Seems performance would on live subjects would be much better and still technically be FMJ. Maybe reliability issues or is it against the GC?


The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with munitions, absolutely nothing.
The Hague accord covers munitions, the U.S. is not a signer of The Hague Accord.



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first