Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by curdog4570
Originally Posted by jorgeI
I see the Express to KOOK-A-MANGA is rapidly filling up....


Do you think the U.S. Military should be able to use private property for training missions if the owner objects?

I'm not claiming that your post infers that.


How about if we amend that statement to include "Without Permission"... ?

I may not be around to "object". Or, I may be asleep.

Owning private property has it's rights. One of them is to post the property against trespass, and have that posting have legal clarity and upstanding in a court of law.



That concept is dying quickly, in the Homeland. You are merely a tenant of Homeland soil, living there and paying rent/taxes to the Owner/Gov't for the privilege of being allowed to keep and improve that property for the benefit of the Owner/Gov't. They will use that property as they see fit, when they choose, and if you object, the property will be taken from you and reappropriated to those who are more "patriotic" to the Homeland.

Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.