Thanks for the post, a little more clarity to the situation.

However, LEO should always defer to the "innocent until proven guilty" parameters within the constitution. Regardless of what the admin. people pushed, or what laws pertain to CDL requirements, the cop on site had the option/time to get a warrant, its not like the truck driver was going anywhere. One of the main concepts within the constitution is the idea of the creation of a "victim", and not the welfare rat, BLM "victim". I'm talking about a person who has been damaged, either physically, financially etc.

In this instance, the nurse caused no victim by refusing the collection of blood, regardless of what the law states. The police officer on the other hand caused a victim by arresting the nurse, denying her freedom. He arrested her based on an administrative conflict, not some charge of damaging/creating a victim. Here in lies one the biggest problems that has created a total misunderstanding within our population as to what rights are, why the constitution was written the way it was, and how law enforcement/gov. takes power away from the people.


“Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.”
― G. Orwell

"Why can't men kill big game with the same cartridges women and kids use?"
_Eileen Clarke


"Unjust authority confers no obligation of obedience."
- Alexander Hamilton