Originally Posted by Reloder28


I once thought that and have engaged in several such arguments only to realize my ignorance. While I assent 100%, I still would never hunt with a 270 voluntarily.


I am going to give you credit... for being humorous.

IF you are NOT..... Do you know how ASININE that is ??

Mule Deer posted on P 10......

[/b]"280 nuts like to argue that their cartridge is vastly superior, but I've hunted a LOT with both the .270 and .280, and for the sub-500 yard big game hunting most people actually do, there isn't any difference--except you can buy .270 ammo and brass easily, almost anywhere.

......If loonies couldn't weigh bullets or lacked chronographs, the differences would never be noticeable, whether in the field or by simply looking at one of the rounds. [b]


I admit I have some IRRational views about some things, but THAT is ridiculous IF you're serious.

I sincerely hope you're not.

Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!