I carried it a little yesterday, and was surprised that it carried just as comfortably, and just as well concealed (in my El Paso Saddlery C-Force IWB - built for the Sig P210, but it's what I routinely carry my Glock 17 in) as my Glock 17.
Odd that I so often hear from reviewers of the 92 that they wouldn't consider it a concealed carry gun, no matter how much they otherwise like it. But then, I hear that about my choice for daily concealed carry, too, i.e., the Glock 17.
I have no intention of switching, but if, for some reason, I were reduced to only owning the Beretta, I wouldn't feel at all disadvantaged vs the Glock 17 in terms of comfort of carry and concealment, and I certainly wouldn't feel ill-armed.
All the above is under the assumption that it proves functionally reliable, which I have no reason to doubt.
