Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Barkoff
Ok, so many have said “due process” is required.

Describe to me “due process” in regards to mental illness.
Is a mental health Dr. standing before a judge, making his/her case to confine their patient for two more weeks, against their will, though no crime has been committed, considered “due process?”

It's been explained to you many times. Will one more time make a difference?



No, actually it has not.


Is a mental health Dr. standing before a judge, making his/her case to confine their patient for two more weeks, against their will, though no crime has been committed, considered “due process?”

How do you define due process with the mentally ill, when it is decided to confine them with no crime being committed? When doctors stand before judges, usually the mentally ill are not represented by or issued legal representation.
So yes, you need to explain due process one more time, because I’m seeing confinement with no crime and no legal representation.