Originally Posted by koshkin
Originally Posted by cumminscowboy
I think it depends on your use of the scopes. if you are mostly shooting at the range, I think the 3-15 is the best. I love the 3-15 power range, but out of all the SWFA line the 3-15's reticle choices are my least liked. The SFP reticle is too fine in that model. I bought one and sent it back because of it. The FFP model is ok if you run the scope on higher powers, ie above 9-10x most of the time. so if it range use, get the FFP 3-15 model. The 3-9 isn't bad, the FFP reticle is still useable on low power although I haven't shot one in field conditions on low power. but it looked pretty good on the dreary day I stopped in to SWFA and looked at all of them. I sure wished they made a second focal plane 3-9, probably would buy 3 if they did. I still want to buy one even though FFP is far from my choice on that power range scope.


There are many SFP 3-9x scopes out on the market. Or are you specifically looking for SWFA's reticle in a SFP scope?

ILya

I am extremely well aware of this. I own them already. I just want SWFA robustness, I also think FFP is the place for very much higher scope power and that SFP is a better fit for optics in this power range. I don't give a crap what the hash marks measure when I am on low power. its point and shoot. When I want to use those hash marks on a 3x9 I will be at max power everytime. I till think that model is a great scope and might buy one anyways though. I just think SFP is a better fit.