Originally Posted by Bugger
Originally Posted by gnoahhh
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Have only known a few people who owned Austin-Healys and .32-40s, but all reported Austin-Healys wore out quicker than .32-40s, either mechanically or emotionally.



Hush your mouth!! grin At least a Healey has more velocity than a .32-40. cool laugh
(I'm as much of a British sports car loonie as I am a rifle loonie. Currently running a pristine 1970 MGBGT, on nice days while waiting for the next thing to break...) MG-TC hopefully in my near future- if you see me selling off a bunch of guns you'll know why.


I bought a MG (newer version of the Austin Healey) new in ‘73. $2,480 for list price.


IIRC, the Healey had a good bit more engine than MGs, maybe a 6? Liked the Healeys and Triumphs, never bought one, sadly.

I foolishly paid $3500 for a new '72 SS396 Camero RS, when 240Zs could be had for just a bit more, if you could find one.


What fresh Hell is this?