Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by Fubarski
People were bitchin cause the Supreme Kangaroos weren't takin 2A cases.

But that was because Roberts wasn't gonna go along with the RKBA.

We'll see if they take some 2A cases, now that Barrett is there.

It only takes 4 SC Justices to vote in favor of hearing a case.



But do you want rule in favor of hearing a case knowing that there was a good chance Roberts would rule against 2A? He not a rabid leftist to the point of going out of his way to hear pro 2A cases just to rule against them but I wouldn’t have any faith in his ruling if a pro 2A case were in front of him.