Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Stickfight
Originally Posted by ironbender
Perhaps he is in a blue state and disallowed from firearm ownership?


Or he recognizes, correctly, that guns aren't a talisman and cannot ensure his family is safe from a 24/7/365 mob likely to number in the hundreds that is supported by both government and private institutions.

Quite a few people here seem to think they are exactly that sort of talisman.

Yes, but my point is that a firearm is ones only chance vs. an angry crowd. Weaponless it would be foolish and futile.


Maybe if he flees to Texas.

How well did things work out for the couple who armed themselves and confronted the crowd in Missouri?

You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell