Originally Posted by AcesNeights
I know that we’re currently NOT a nation of law and our Constitution is irrelevant to our enemies, it’s nothing more than an outdated and inconvenient obstacle to their ultimate goal of total control. It’s become all too clear that the communists own our politicians and recently we’ve witnessed a political bias in our judiciary eliminating any checks on unchecked power that was the Constitutional responsibility of SCOTUS. With the disgusting behavior of corrupt judges any further discussion of law, specifically Constitutional law, is hypothetical. My question assumes what a once great nation would do, NOT what is likely to happen as a result of power, greed and corruption.....

Is it legally possible or Constitutionally allowed to hold an impeachment trial against a citizen, a person that is no longer in office? I understand the political motivation for the communists because it’s just another way for them to subvert the will of the people. If a person was so unqualified and undesirable then it should be the choice of the electorate to decide if they’re fit to represent us, not a small minute number of political scum making the decision for 80+ million voters.

It doesn’t seem legal to impeach someone that isn’t in office?
.................There is NO legal ground nor any Constitutional grounds whatsoever for this impeachment. It is no more than a feel good revenge party for the socialist, marxist demCRAPs, who think that by doing so will make Trump ineligible to run for POTUS in 2024.......There was nothing in his speech on Jan 6th that incited anyone to breach the capital. ON TAPE. Trump lawyers will have a field day ripping the dems to shreds in any senate trial, which by the way, John Roberts to my knowledge said that he would not preside over.

The demCRAP party could care less about the law or the Constitution especially when it blocks their anti-American agenda.


28 Nosler,,,,300WSM,,,,338-378 Wby,,,,375 Ruger