"On April 1st, the judge held that the Forest Service is not disposing any waste by allowing hunters to hunt in accordance with state laws. But the case had even bigger implications. The Plaintiff was asking the court to order the Forest Service regulate hunting. But the states own the wildlife, even while it is on federal lands. “Each national forest,” the judge said, “is required to cooperate with state wildlife agencies to allow hunting in ‘accordance with the requirements of State laws.”’ A ruling to the contrary would have given the federal government the authority to enter a field of regulation that belongs to the states on lands where hunting takes place. Those implications would be huge because 640-million acres (about twenty-eight percent of the country) is owned and managed by the federal government. Thankfully, the judge sided with NRA-ILA and Safari Club."
Tell it to Alaska.
The Feds have repeatedly violated our Statehood Act provisions with this and several other things.
As far as I am concerned, that should invalidate the contract and make Alaska a free country.
Good luck with that. Involuntary indenture seems to go only one way.... no backup there.
Last edited by las; 04/04/21.
