You'd have to know the percentage of vaxxed vs unvaxxed in the general population for it to have any meaning. Naturally if 90% of the people in the area are vaxxed {like in Isreal} then more cases/deaths are likely to be vaxxed.
Your an idiot 63% of the death are fully vaccinated that is real meaning
You're the fuggin idiot. If 90% of the population in the area are vaxxed, then 90% of the deaths would have to be vaxxed in order to be breaking even percentage wise with unvaxxed deaths. If 63% of the deaths are vaxxed and 63% of the population in the area are vaxxed, then the odds of death between vaxxed and unvaxxed are even because 37% were unvaxxed and they accounted for 37% of the deaths.. Of course your dumb ass won't be able to grasp that so you might better just STFU and let people with an IQ higher than that of a goldfish discuss the issue. Moron.
Your math is correct, but what we dont know, or at least I didn't see, is the percentage of people vaccinated in this area. If 50% are vaccinated and 63% of the deaths are from vaccinated people.... then the shots are not working. On the other hand, if 90% are vaccinated and 63% of the deaths occur in this group, then the shots are working. Without knowing the percentage of vaccinated people, all the figuring in the world doesn't mean a thing. Except that over this time period 63% of the deaths were vaccinated people.
