John;
Good evening thanks for the reply.
Now that you mention it, I recall reading at least one article where you mentioned that and thought, "yah, that's what I found in the 94 that one time".
In this instance and in many others, I am somewhat hesitant to reply because my "sample size" is often awfully small.
Not blowing smoke up your kilt here, but I've always appreciated how you articulate the process you've gone through to arrive at the findings you then report. Hopefully that made sense?
All that to say I can usually follow along when I read.
Glad to read your weather has given you a bit of a break too.
It's been pretty warm in the valley here and yesterday instead of going ice fishing I broke out the rototiller and gave one garden patch a couple hard passes. Of course it snowed a wee bit last night, but is raining again now.
I remember that cold snap in March up here a couple years back too, though we didn't get that cold, but it wrecked the buds on a few trees that had budded early.
Thanks again for the reply and all the best to you and Eileen.
Dwayne
