Originally Posted by BuzzH
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by BuzzH
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by BuzzH
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by BillyGoatGruff
Jim, would the Cowan’s agree to be equated with Hanoi Jane and Ted Turner? I know some that hunted their ground but never did myself.


They would just love that shìt!


.

Sure they would, both understand stewardship, both have large ranches, both have good management plans, both acquire property when it's for sale from willing sellers.

Wayyyyyy more similarities than differences, other than the type of livestock. That's a fact.

For the record, how much time have you spent on AP property? Turners? Cowan's?

I've spent lots of time on all 3...all have similar management, damn near identical in their goals. Another fact.


You are a typical leftist access limiter.


The APR couldn't pack Bill's saddle when it comes to stewardship.


Go dream something else up.

Go sober up...drunk. Or have another swig, better yet.

So you think Cowans are access limiting greedy pricks who just swindle eastern donors to gain an advantage in land development deals in Western Montana.

So you know...AP has just shy of 80,000 acres enrolled in block management.

Access limiting you say?

What a joke you are.

Wow 80,000 acres. That's one large ranch. Big deal.