|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 21,828 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 21,828 Likes: 3 |
FWIW:
I would answer this question based upon shooting ability and terrrain.
180s are the standard. Don't leave them unless you have reason to do so.
165s shoot flatter, but unless you are likely to go beyond 300 yards, you might not get much benefit.
Thus, a guy on the dry side of the Cascades, with more open range might go 165, a guy on the coastal side (dense forest) might go 180s--better chance of an exit and blood trail in the think stuff, no need for super flat.
In the end though, we ar splitting hairs. Both kill stuff real dead, real well.
Choose one that shoots well in your rifle, practice a LOT and go hunting.
BMT
"The Church can and should help modern society by tirelessly insisting that the work of women in the home be recognized and respected by all in its irreplaceable value." Apostolic Exhortation On The Family, Pope John Paul II
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
JCMCUBIC
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
johnw
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
BMT
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
JCMCUBIC
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
johnw
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
JCMCUBIC
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
magnumb
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Big_Redhead
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
BCBrian
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
JCMCUBIC
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Brad
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
jim in Oregon
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
colorado bob
|
12/07/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Brad
|
12/07/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
MPH17001
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Brad
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Coyote_Hunter
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
hotsoup
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
mudhen
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
BobinNH
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
StubbleDuck
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
alpinecrick
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Jeff_O
|
12/09/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
zimhunter
|
12/09/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
allenday
|
12/09/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
LeosRedFox
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
zxc
|
12/08/07
|
|
|
182 members (1badf350, 338rcm, 06hunter59, 2UP, 160user, 300_savage, 16 invisible),
1,952
guests, and
1,108
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,326
Posts18,526,504
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|