|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,781 Likes: 6
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,781 Likes: 6 |
Thanks for the input.
200's aren't really in the running as they go (IMHO) beyond what is needed for the range of game.
If the construction is the same between the 2....which is really one of my major questions as johnw kinda hit on......then, BMT hit the important point with the shot distance and shooter's ability.
Assuming the shooter is up to it, at what range will the trajectory differences between the 165 and 180 really come into play?
Again, is the construction between the 2 the same, or is the 180 actually constructed "tougher" rather than just "heavier"? I don't know so I have to ask.
Thanks,
JCM
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
JCMCUBIC
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
johnw
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
BMT
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
JCMCUBIC
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
johnw
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
JCMCUBIC
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
magnumb
|
12/05/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Big_Redhead
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
BCBrian
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
JCMCUBIC
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Brad
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
jim in Oregon
|
12/06/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
colorado bob
|
12/07/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Brad
|
12/07/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
MPH17001
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Brad
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Coyote_Hunter
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
hotsoup
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
mudhen
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
BobinNH
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
StubbleDuck
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
alpinecrick
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
Jeff_O
|
12/09/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
zimhunter
|
12/09/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
allenday
|
12/09/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
LeosRedFox
|
12/08/07
|
Re: Partition, 30-06, 165 vs 180 for all-around?
|
zxc
|
12/08/07
|
|
|
393 members (1badf350, 17CalFan, 1Longbow, 160user, 1lesfox, 163bc, 36 invisible),
2,411
guests, and
1,053
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,329
Posts18,526,651
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|