Exactly. But perfection is the enemy of good enough.
I find that using the G7 in my computer models is "good enough" for my purposes. I also think looking for "more better" methods of prediction is not something I would bother with, because as long as there is a human in the equation and that the universe is chaotic, it won't get better. Perhaps when maximum entropy is reached the models will work prefectly every time. Until then, I'll just try to read conditions better.
BTW, I do not denigrate computers after all it's been my career for 36 years now. But I also know their prediction capabilities in a chaotic world, which is why I laugh at climate alarmists.
