So you don't believe THIS report, or the original accusations, Ringman? You've confused me.
Here's what I think is happening - whether or not this Bialek woman is credible, I think there is something to the OTHER accusations - those which the NRA settled. Bialek might be just another vicim of Herman Cain, or she might be diabolical and smart enough to use those REAL victims as cover for her little scheme. Either way, it's put Cain in a real bind, because he keeps contradicting himself and now he has outside help trying to defend him but also contradicting him. In short, he's in a real [bleep] now. A woman from one of those "settled" cases has now come forward on the record, too, so it might get even more interesting.
what's not adding up is your apparent hard on for a man who's been accused of something that is obviously questionable.
i don't know what he did or didn't do for sure, and neither do you. yet you have posted all over the place trying to act like you're J. Edgar freaking Hoover trying to catch somebody in a lie. he's been asked a billion questions from a billion different people all trying to goad him into saying something they (and you) can construe as a lie.
the reason it devolves into an "insult-fest" is because most folks here don't give a crap what you think about this issue. especially your smug little habit of trying to slide in what you think as a fact, ie:
"Either way, it's put Cain in a real bind, because he keeps contradicting himself and now he has outside help trying to defend him but also contradicting him. In short, he's in a real [bleep] now."what are you, the politics god or something? should i just ask you how to vote, and not bother with anything else?
