But he didn't - because he didn't know exactly who was doing the accusing - he had to wait and see WHICH accuser was coming forward, because he knew there was more than one incident perhaps?
or perhaps he's telling the truth, and simply could not recall something that happened 14 years ago off the top of his head.
and just to be clear, whether or not she's lying this time, she IS lying opportunistic scum, if what is reported about her is accurate.
of course, at least in
some people's eyes, she doesn't have to explain her past, unlike Cain.
me? i typically believe the side of the argument that doesn't come from proven liars. i'm funny that way i guess.
