Let me see if I get this correctly. I should believe an anonymous someone on the internet rather than someone I have spoken with over the years and have come to respect? I don't think so.
Isn't that exactly what you're asking everyone else to do?
I guess it'd be different if Lonnie had written down his results so people could see them. I don't doubt the guy knows his stuff, and I don't doubt that he's proven something to himself.
But that's not what I'd call proving something beyond doubt, or however it was that you characterized it.
As far as I can tell, you're asking us to "believe an anonymous someone on the internet."
