|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54 |
Stick, I believe I have barrowed your quote and humbly beg your pardon for the transgression. The quote however is thought provoking and I feel deserving of some more discussion among the knowledgable forum members given your permission of course. Also thank you kindly for the advise in the optics thread it is much appreciated. I've decided to trip the Sako simply due to it is compromised for my intended use. I feel after some research that the Fixed 6 MQ is likely a mismatch for the 270 application. The 6 MQ it appears shines at 400 and beyond however I feel the 270 shines mostly at 300 and closer. I'm a close pay attentioner and I think I remember you saying some thing about a 162 A-MAX leaving the barrel at around 2700. I'm thinking 7mm-08 This statement if I got it correct sets up at least one part of what I hope to discuss in this thread. I am under the assumption that the reason for the 2700 number is that you intend on useing this bullet for close and way out there. I've crunched some numbers and it certainly seem realistic if the 162 performs as one would like at 2700 ish velocities up close. I've never tried it however am assuming you likely have on more than one occasion. If this concept works well the versatility factor would be increased by a wide margin. The other side of the bullets and headstamps theory in my mind is am I better off sticking with rifles for two intended purposes. For example I have a tikka T3 270 that Ive loaded with a 150 partition leaving the muzzle at 2830 ish. I feel very confident taking a shoulder shot on an elk out to around 400 yds. The flip side would be perhaps a 7mm-08 loaded with a 162 A-MAX at 2700. There is little doubt in my mind that the 162 would likely perform better at 400-600 ish yds. I havent crunched the numbers however assume the 162 leaving at 150 fps slower than the 270 150 partition at 300 yds has likely caught up and rapidly outrunning the partition and with 10 more grains of bullet designed to expand very well at 2350 ish velocities all the way down to 1600 or so which brings one well beyond the 600 yd line. I think I know which way I'm leaning however there is sometimes wisdom in the multitude of council so I'd like to hear others experience and thoughts. Not just on the example I have cited but on the theory in general. Are short range bullet becoming obsolete or perhaps lacking in versatility? THANKS MUCH FOREST
Last edited by Forest; 11/18/15.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,923
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,923 |
You quote him, you direct the message to him and then ask for the opinion of others.
Tag/future entertainment...
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54 |
You quote him, you direct the message to him and then ask for the opinion of others.
Tag/future entertainment... Dave, It is a given that one needs not ask for opinions around here. Opinions are readily given and often far from the given subject. We really have no idea where this thread may go. I was thinking popcorn around 8:30 ish however decided crown and coke may be more appropriate. FOREST
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638 |
I havent crunched the numbers however assume the 162 leaving at 150 fps slower than the 270 150 partition at 300 yds has likely caught up and rapidly outrunning the partition and with 10 more grains of bullet designed to expand very well at 2350 ish velocities all the way down to 1600 or so which brings one well beyond the 600 yd line. I think I know which way I'm leaning however there is sometimes wisdom in the multitude of council so I'd like to hear others experience and thoughts. Not just on the example I have cited but on the theory in general. Are short range bullet becoming obsolete or perhaps lacking in versatility? In the amount of time you spent writing that post, you could have run the numbers yourself. That aside, comparing the usefulness of two cartridges in your manner is quite a strawman. Give the 270 a VLD type bullet if you want to be fair. Using a Partition is a hatchet job.
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle. I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,267
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,267 |
You quote him, you direct the message to him and then ask for the opinion of others.
Tag/future entertainment... Ditto........
Casey
Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively... Having said that, MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,180 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,180 Likes: 1 |
Do people really say "ish?"
P
Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Member #547 Join date 3/09/2001
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54 |
I havent crunched the numbers however assume the 162 leaving at 150 fps slower than the 270 150 partition at 300 yds has likely caught up and rapidly outrunning the partition and with 10 more grains of bullet designed to expand very well at 2350 ish velocities all the way down to 1600 or so which brings one well beyond the 600 yd line. I think I know which way I'm leaning however there is sometimes wisdom in the multitude of council so I'd like to hear others experience and thoughts. Not just on the example I have cited but on the theory in general. Are short range bullet becoming obsolete or perhaps lacking in versatility? In the amount of time you spent writing that post, you could have run the numbers yourself. That aside, comparing the usefulness of two cartridges in your manner is quite a strawman. Give the 270 a VLD type bullet if you want to be fair. Using a Partition is a hatchet job. Obviously I spent more time writing it than you did reading it. My post is not about comparing the 270 partition to the 162 A-MAX. Read it one more time ( SLOWLY ) This statement if I got it correct sets up at least one part of what I hope to discuss in this thread. I am under the assumption that the reason for the 2700 number is that you intend on useing this bullet for close and way out there.I've crunched some numbers and it certainly seem realistic if the 162 performs as one would like at 2700 ish velocities up close. I've never tried it however am assuming you likely have on more than one occasion. If this concept works well the versatility factor would be increased by a wide margin.
The other side of the bullets and headstamps theory in my mind is am I better off sticking with rifles for two intended purposes.
Are short range bullet becoming obsolete or perhaps lacking in versatility?
FOREST
Last edited by Forest; 11/18/15.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638 |
Which one of the old trolls are you in this new "Forest" wrapping?
My guess is WET
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle. I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 22,274
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 22,274 |
Well, I was about to say a 130gr Accubond at 3200 ish would beat both, but I could save two letters and say ~3200
"...the designer of the .270 Ingwe cartridge!..."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54 |
Which one of the old trolls are you in this new "Forest" wrapping?
My guess is WET How does your not reading my post make me a Troll If you dont like this thread go find another. A troll is someone who follows someone around. Right now I'm not following you. YOUR following me..... on my thread. CONTRIBUTE SOMETHING POSITIVE OR BEAT IT FOREST
Last edited by Forest; 11/18/15.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638 |
Which one of the old trolls are you in this new "Forest" wrapping?
My guess is WET How does your not reading my post make me a Troll If you dont like this thread go find another. A troll is someone who follows someone around. Right now I'm not following you. YOUR following me..... on my thread. CONTRIBUTE SOMETHING POSITIVE OR BEAT IT FOREST I'm glad you're back, WET. I was wondering what happened to you. How did the Cermalube experiments go?
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle. I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,518 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,518 Likes: 1 |
Here's a cross-section of impact velocities. 2260 and 1965fps impact... 162 on elk linky 2530 impact, caught under offside hide after smashing onside humerus... 3015 impact, exit wound When running MV's up there beyond 3000, if there's a good possibility of a lengthwise shot at spitting distance, I'll carry a mag-full of 140 TTSX bullets, with a few 162's in a pocket in case of a LR opportunity with ample time to set up. If starting them out at ~2750, then I've not seen a need to rely on other bullets for close shots, since IV's won't be very strenuous on the 162.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 54 |
Thanks Jordan, The real life experience is much appreciated. I am always open to listening to ones who have been there and done it. I'm looking forward to both the positive experiences and negative. About the only thing that does'nt interest me is someone standing in a snowbank up to there belly giving advice on something they likely havent tried. FOREST
Last edited by Forest; 11/18/15.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,087 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,087 Likes: 1 |
Bullet placement trumps bullet type and head stamp.
So far this year I shot a moose at about 80 yards and an elk at 360 yards( lasered ) , 180 gr Nosler PT,.06 at about 2700fps MV.. Elk went about 15 yards, moose went about 15 feet
Last edited by saddlesore; 11/18/15.
If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,494
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,494 |
Great bullets and great placement trumps all.
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 18,075
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 18,075 |
Let's see FOREST registers on 10-5-15 and Posts on the wrong FORUM to Big Stick!
How far is too far?
You can't figure out how to make a 150gr Partition work to 600 yards?
Then I submit you shouldn't be using game bullets that far and stick to shooting steel and paper!!
Mike
God, Family, and Country. NRA Endowment Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,996
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,996 |
Do people really say "ish?" P WET has to say "ish" on the velocity. He doesn't know how to set up a chronograph.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,930 Likes: 15
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,930 Likes: 15 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,428
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,428 |
"I can't be canceled, because, I don't give a fuuck!" --- Kid Rock 2022
Holocaust Deniers, the ultimate perverted dipchits: Bristoe, TheRealHawkeye, stophel, Ghostinthemachine, anyone else?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,158 Likes: 3
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,158 Likes: 3 |
Life Member SCI Life Member DSC Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association
Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard
Ken
|
|
|
|
518 members (222Sako, 10Glocks, 219 Wasp, 21, 1minute, 1OntarioJim, 51 invisible),
2,396
guests, and
1,203
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,432
Posts18,489,309
Members73,970
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|