Having trouble with my RAR, well, technically the magazines.
I get FTF's if I don't put just the right amount of pressure on the bottom of the magazine as I cycle the bolt.
I know this was an issue with the RAR when it first came out - but I though Ruger had straightened the problem out by now. Is anyone else having this problem?
As an aside, is Ruger ever going to build the RAR with a hinged floorplate, or is there a way to economically change it over to a hinged floorplate?
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.
Funny you ask. I just picked up an American Predator that has the AR style magazine. The stock has a detachable 'insert' where the action screws go through. It is obvious that Ruger can then just change the stock insert when building to accept the rotary or AR mags. I emailed them twice as I wanted to convert from the AR mag to a rotary. Upon my second request I was told they weren't offer the stock insert to change magazine styles. I don't think the existing stock design would function with a hinged floorplate arrangement.
For an economy gun the Ruger American is pretty darn good but the magazine arrangement and feed kind of sux. When shooting the American with my Tikka's I kept double checking the chamber thinking the Tikka was empty since it feeds sooooo smooth.
Having trouble with my RAR, well, technically the magazines.
I get FTF's if I don't put just the right amount of pressure on the bottom of the magazine as I cycle the bolt.
I know this was an issue with the RAR when it first came out - but I though Ruger had straightened the problem out by now. Is anyone else having this problem?
As an aside, is Ruger ever going to build the RAR with a hinged floorplate, or is there a way to economically change it over to a hinged floorplate?
Ruger hasn't straightened schidt out. Their quality control is abhorrent.
The 450 Bushmaster mags work better with SA cartridges (except 223) and are more reliable. They stick out from the bottom of the stock maybe an inch or less. They have a normal spring and follower instead of the rotary boloney. I used them with the 22-250 I had and they worked fine.
The 450 Bushmaster mags work better with SA cartridges (except 223) and are more reliable. They stick out from the bottom of the stock maybe an inch or less. They have a normal spring and follower instead of the rotary boloney. I used them with the 22-250 I had and they worked fine.
This!!!!!!!
Crossed Arrows Archery LLC Authorized Obsession Bows Dealer Custom Strings/Tuning www.crossedarrowsarcheryllc.com Black Eagle Arrows Pro Staff, Montana Black Gold Shooting Staff, Dead Center Archery Products Shooting Staff
I had trouble with 4 different magazines on two different RAR's. Life's too short to screw around with inferior/cheapass equipment so they all went down the road. They did shoot good though.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
Send the mag back to Ruger and they will replace it. I've owned and shot a bunch of those rifles, over a dozen with multiple magazines for each. I had to send one back years ago and I have one now that needs to go back. All others have fed just fine. BUT.... I have broken 2 of the rotary magazines when dropped on carpet. When loaded and they hit the floor they simply broke. I've never had a single issue with the versions with AI magazines. If you have a newish rifle converting over is easy.
And while I've not tried the 450 mag my brother has and it is a better design. But I'd still rather convert to AI magazines if possible.
Most people don't really want the truth.
They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
I had trouble with 4 different magazines on two different RAR's. Life's too short to screw around with inferior/cheapass equipment so they all went down the road. They did shoot good though.
No offense meant, but if you wanted a Ruger with 1st class quality, why not get a Hawkeye or a RPR ? You did, afterall, buy a "budget" rifle.
only issue i've had with the rar mags is my 260 rem was extremely tight to get the 4th round in and when you did you had to almost hit the bolt handle with your palm to get it to go forward. ruger promptly sent me a replacement that will hold 4 and is easy to chamber round 1-4. ruger is usually good cs. granted the best cs is that that you never use but the guy above is right in that they are classified as budget guns and as such require a lil fiddling sometimes. most are pretty accurate though which makes up alotta time to me. Big Ed
"Only accurate rifles are interesting" Col. Townsend Whelen
Whttail, is that a non-rotary (for lack of a better term)? Is it flush with the bottom of the stock?
The rotary that came with my .308 has always worked fine, but I can see buying one of those.
'Four legs good, two legs baaaad." ---------------------------------------------- "Jimmy, some of it's magic, Some of it's tragic, But I had a good life all the way." (Jimmy Buffett)
Whttail, is that a non-rotary (for lack of a better term)? Is it flush with the bottom of the stock?
The rotary that came with my .308 has always worked fine, but I can see buying one of those.
It's center feed, stagger stack (non-rotary), and flush fit.
Thank you, I'll have one of those shortly.
'Four legs good, two legs baaaad." ---------------------------------------------- "Jimmy, some of it's magic, Some of it's tragic, But I had a good life all the way." (Jimmy Buffett)