Hahahahaahahahaha so brandishing weapons while pursuing someone isnt a threat of imminent violence?? Hahahahahahaha gosh darn your a retard hahahahaha
You folks need to decide whether we're talking about the cop talking to him on video or the video of him attacking the man with the shotgun.
The principle doesn't change, but I was conversing with someone about the cop video.
No you do.... its not okay for Arbery to verbally act aggressive to you, as that portrays an imminent threat of danger...
However you think its okay for the McMichaels to chase him for 4minutes while brandishing firearms, which is an overly obvious imminent threat of danger.
Like I said, your a fugging retard.... its blatantly obvious you think rights are only afforded to white people, its okay for you to state as much. At least then your being honest.
To ask a question? Anyone is free to ask someone a question.
You said the approach by LE for suspicion of loitering is justified even if based strictly on a hunch... LoL.
When it comes to law you are dumber than a bag of clam shells.
To detain, he needs reasonable suspicion. To ask a question because he has a hunch based on th totality of the circumstances that might even be inarticulable, he needs not have reasonable suspicion. He can, in other words, have mere suspicion, falling below the reasonable suspicion standard.
Hahahahaahahahaha so brandishing weapons while pursuing someone isnt a threat of imminent violence?? Hahahahahahaha gosh darn your a retard hahahahaha
You folks need to decide whether we're talking about the cop talking to him on video or the video of him attacking the man with the shotgun.
The principle doesn't change, but I was conversing with someone about the cop video.
No you do.... its not okay for Arbery to verbally act aggressive to you, as that portrays an imminent threat of danger...
However you think its okay for the McMichaels to chase him for 4minutes while brandishing firearms, which is an overly obvious imminent threat of danger.
Like I said, your a fugging retard.... its blatantly obvious you think rights are only afforded to white people, its okay for you to state as much. At least then your being honest.
Do you have a link to the 4 minute video? I’ve only seen the short one
To ask a question? Anyone is free to ask someone a question.
You said the approach by LE for suspicion of loitering is justified even if based strictly on a hunch... LoL.
When it comes to law you are dumber than a bag of clam shells.
To detain, he needs reasonable suspicion. To ask a question because he has a hunch based on th totality of the circumstances that might even be inarticulable, he needs not have reasonable suspicion. He can, in other words, have mere suspicion, falling below the reasonable suspicion standard.
And Arbery didnt need to comply, he didnt need to answer, he didnt need to show an ID... and he had every right to tell the cop to piss off.
Hahahahaahahahaha so brandishing weapons while pursuing someone isnt a threat of imminent violence?? Hahahahahahaha gosh darn your a retard hahahahaha
You folks need to decide whether we're talking about the cop talking to him on video or the video of him attacking the man with the shotgun.
The principle doesn't change, but I was conversing with someone about the cop video.
No you do.... its not okay for Arbery to verbally act aggressive to you, as that portrays an imminent threat of danger...
However you think its okay for the McMichaels to chase him for 4minutes while brandishing firearms, which is an overly obvious imminent threat of danger.
Like I said, your a fugging retard.... its blatantly obvious you think rights are only afforded to white people, its okay for you to state as much. At least then your being honest.
Do you have a link to the 4 minute video? I’ve only seen the short one
I do not, but both sides lawyers say the video is 4 mins of them chasing him. What that entails Im not sure.
4 minutes is a long time when someone is coming after you with a gun.
To ask a question? Anyone is free to ask someone a question.
You said the approach by LE for suspicion of loitering is justified even if based strictly on a hunch... LoL.
When it comes to law you are dumber than a bag of clam shells.
And he’s absolutely right. A cop can approach you and ask you anything he wants anytime for no reason whatsoever. It’s called a consensual encounter. You can tell him to fugg off and walk away if you want to and then he’s gonna need a reason to detain you but he doesn’t need one to approach you in the first place.
And Arbery didnt need to comply, he didnt need to answer, he didnt need to show an ID... and he had every right to tell the cop to piss off.
Unless or until he triggered reasonable suspicion, that is indeed the case. We don't know, however if or when reasonable suspicion was triggered, authorizing detainment.
And Arbery didnt need to comply, he didnt need to answer, he didnt need to show an ID... and he had every right to tell the cop to piss off.
Unless or until he triggered reasonable suspicion, that is indeed the case. We don't know, however if or when reasonable suspicion was triggered, authorizing detainment.
Indeed not the case, hence he didnt search the car... clueless.
And Arbery didnt need to comply, he didnt need to answer, he didnt need to show an ID... and he had every right to tell the cop to piss off.
Unless or until he triggered reasonable suspicion, that is indeed the case. We don't know, however if or when reasonable suspicion was triggered, authorizing detainment.
Indeed not the case, hence he didnt search the car... clueless.
I haven't asserted that Arbery in fact triggered reasonable suspicion. I said the cop didn't need reasonable suspicion to merely ask him some questions. RS is required to detain, not to talk.
I don’t blame Arbery for being mad about be hassled by the cops in the park. It’s hard enough to find a quite place to conduct a little research on a cure for cancer without the cops showing up the frick with you.
Bristoe - how come it took two months to hit the national news? Could it have been the video proved the good ole’ boy network in GA is alive and well, and thats what the outrage is about? It couldn’t be a DA who has strong ties to the killers helped sweep it under the rug, no, couldnt be that huh?
Bristoe - how come it took two months to hit the national news? Could it have been the video proved the good ole’ boy network in GA is alive and well, and thats what the outrage is about? It couldn’t be a DA who has strong ties to the killers helped sweep it under the rug, no, couldnt be that huh?
