Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire So, which of the 6 theories of Evolution do you unbelievers believe in?

Intelligent men playing in the laboratory. Secondly there is evolution. It's called adaptability. From where did the adaptors come? That is the question.

Lines of evidence: The science of evolution : "Richard Lenski of Michigan State University is in charge of the world's longest-running evolution experiment. Since 1988, Lenski has been tracking 12 populations of Escherichia coli bacteria in his lab. The bacteria are left to their own devices in storage containers, with nutrients to feed on, and Lenski's team regularly freezes small samples.
The E. coli are no longer the same as they were in 1988. "In all 12 populations, the bacteria have evolved to grow much faster than did their ancestor," says Lenski. They have adapted to the specific mix of chemicals he gives them.
"It's a very direct demonstration of Darwin's idea of adaptation by natural selection. Now, 20-some years into the experiment, the typical lineage grows about 80% faster than did the ancestor."

Difference between the Theories of Gods and the Theory of Evolutionary Gods.

Man wondered where he came from
Talked to God on a daily basis
Evolved to one God
Evolved to God taking human form

Today

Man wondered where he came from

The

Hahaha. Tff. Good one.

Great to see your posts again, Etoh.

Experiments in Self Organizational studies and the Science of Evolution are not owned by biologists, and they don't own the definitions. (thats what the argument is anyway, ---- what is intelligence?---)

The entire universe evolves,self organizes and re-directs it self on whatever the smallest time scale imaginable on the quantum level.

Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics people have their evolution

Bifurcation and Chaos people have their evolution

Enzymologists and molecular biologists have their evolution

This is the non-constant era.

1900-2000 was the constant era

everything had to have a constant.

speed of light a constant
smallest piece of matter
smallest piece of energy
total mass of the universe was constant
etc.

Seems like Mendel started this type of work in 1865.

This is simple genetic variation.... genetics, not evolution..... natural selection is not evolution. Do you see how “genetics” and “natural selection” have been characterized as “micro evolution?” Simple propaganda to get folks to,think that evolution has been proven. It has not.

Do you see this is nothing more than what Darwin observed in the finches?

This e Coli is still E. coli. Same as breeding big dogs, little dogs, dogs with long hair, dogs with good noses. All are still dogs. Not cats and not raccoons.... they are all still dogs.

There is nothing to see here.....sos

Bowsinger, this has been explained to you many times and yet you choose to not listen. Now it is time for you to quit this and be quiet while we pray for you. God knows you need all the help you can get.

We're all rooting for him not to need that helmet one day.

Wrong on two counts.

Genetics was used by the Egyptians and they used Fibonacci sequences as their "algebra" to explain the mechanics.

some Biology (outdated taxonomy) uses as their "algebra" to explain differences, or when their is a difference -- the math of Bertrand Russell -- Set Theory, or Boolean type logic
instead of Fuzzy Logic of Zadeh, as in when does a cat become a dog.

like comparing apples and oranges hmmm

apples and oranges have more in common than not in common

same size
same weight
almost same amt. of carbohydrates
both have seeds
both can be cut with a knife.

Wouldnt chickens have had a higher survival rate if they had been armed with some teeth for defensive purposes?

Why did every critter evolving from the sea end up developing into being a predator of some of its offspring and prey to another? IWO, a relationship of enmity developed between fox and fawn. Did some fawns decide there were too many of them esting acorns and just naturally decide to start morphing into foxes in order to develop mother natures balancing act?

They could have just kept growing into deer which became too populus for their environment and died out from starvation from not enough grass.That would have been easier than having to develop into being something that could really haul ass.

Oh, now i get it. The earlier fawns wanted to be foxes so they could help their buds develop survival of the fittest.

Hey, that was really a pretty INTELLIGENT PLAN.

Here is a good example of hard set theory

If we look at it from inclusion or union of set elements, and the implication is God is involved, then the implication is kind, gracious and humanitarian

from the point of intersection of set elements or exclusion Beans prays everynight to the other god, (devil, belzabub,) Bowsinger will run into a brick wall going a 100 mph.

Hahaha. Too cool for school.

Hmm your getting into Game theory
the first one is the prisoners dilemma
the second one is tit for tat
the fawn or third one is the called the hawk and dove dilemma

Etoh, im hoping you looked at JGs elevated Calcium thread.

Whatever you're on must be really good.

It’s a common misinterpretation of evolution to think that humans were lineally descended from existing species of apes. Some people think that a fossil ape-man or man-ape seems necessary in order to ‘prove’ evolution. Today it is widely recognized that the relationship of modern humans to the present species of apes is through common ancestors ‘rather’ than through direct descent.

Wow! Who knew?

Neither Britannica or your own wishful thinking
theistic Faith can know if Constantine was a
real deal christian.. Yet you positively made
out that he was...

You tried to make it by Faking it and FAILED.



So now you can see both anger and hostility?
about as much credibility as your
claim that Constantine was christian.

Keep imagining/fabricating since
it's working so well for you... 😂




Citing Britannica to back your claim of
Constantines faith/Christianity is laughable.
To me that reeks of desperation or its
just sheer stupidity, I will let you decide.



You alleged that you had been repeatedly attacked.
people who get attacked are normally deemed victims... Your claims of attack may well be fabricated-
make believe, like your Constantine claim.