|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690
Campfire Oracle
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690 |
According to science, we should be reverting, over the ages, back to the original first humans.
Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690
Campfire Oracle
|
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690 |
Todays science is, unfortunately ,a consensus
reasons being it is not science, but technology ----- there is a difference.
Not one great scientific idea or breakthrough was done by consensus.
somebody had a revelation, an epiphany, call it what you want, and all the players lined up. it was because they "knew" science (at least up to that point in history) more players lined up This^^^ And yes, like treating H pylori or a silver bullet for C-19.
Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,487
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,487 |
main difference between apples and oranges is citric acid.
once man figured out they needed Vit C, oranges (citrus fruit) was carried wherever shipping went.
apples meh, high fructose, requiring ATP and purines spells gout. Yes, but how did apples know to become oranges because man needed Vit C. The apple came first . Remember, there was an apple tree in the Garden of Eden.  unfounded assumption, apple was chosen for metaphorical sweetness remember the fructose 100s sweeter than sugar. the writings were adjusted to appeal to the masses.
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690
Campfire Oracle
|
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690 |
Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,487
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,487 |
According to science, we should be reverting, over the ages, back to the original first humans. we are using technology of the cell phone is not the same as knowing how the chip works.
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,488
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,488 |
I thought science proved that as time progressed, things became less specialized.
Put tame feral pigs in the forest for generations and they eventually revert back to the hogs they were originally. IOW, less specialized. Sir, respectfully...how is a feral hog that obtains its own food and water in the wild, “less specialized” than a hog in a pen that is totally dependent upon others for its sustenance...?
Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,487
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,487 |
Todays science is, unfortunately ,a consensus
reasons being it is not science, but technology ----- there is a difference.
Not one great scientific idea or breakthrough was done by consensus.
somebody had a revelation, an epiphany, call it what you want, and all the players lined up. it was because they "knew" science (at least up to that point in history) more players lined up This^^^ And yes, like treating H pylori or a silver bullet for C-19. not exactly , when the C popped up with the Plaquenil question I posted 2-3 months ago that Plaquenil had ARB properties, and as such Losarten (or any ARB/ACE2) would be a competitive inhibitor. and would work Im not the only one, but it was overridden by the consensus at the Heart institute who aren't hormone specialized Ca/Mg/Zn for viral infections has been around since (Natures Bounty) since the 70s Real science is knowing how to build the pyramids without needing pi. type things. ex.
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690
Campfire Oracle
|
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690 |
Truth, and Hydroxychloroquine, along with those works well.
However, i was referring to Dr Richard Bartletts use of budesonide inhaled steroid which is cleared for use even for premies, Etoh.
Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,824
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,824 |
I'll post this once agian. ![[Linked Image from speakingofresearch.files.wordpress.com]](https://speakingofresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/blind-men-and-the-elephant.jpg)
These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o
"May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097 |
The Gospels=gossip=you said, they said he said=heresy = hearsay
The Theory of God=BELIEF (FAITH) in Mind before Matter Folks used to see tangible Gods in the elements Earth, Air, Fire, Water. Then they saw them in the planets and other heavenly bodies, Now they believe in an unknowable invisible intangible God beyond the known universe, and get upset IF you question the veracity of what popped out of the imaginations of Bibilcal story writers. The thing christians can't escape is that the Jesus character does not match the essential word of God Biblical Messianic criteria... but they just bury their heads in the sand on the matter. Since the foundational claims of Jesus as the Messiah are so flawed, How much of what is written and relayed about that mysterious Jesus character can actually be taken as truth? Anonymous Gospel authors and Paul, (that some Christians describe as a break-away paranoid schizophrenic) do little to make the case for Jesus.
-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,640
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,640 |
The failure isn't on the 'evolutionist' side. Evolution is a fact, theory lies in explaining the means of evolution ... You've formulated it like this before, and have already been corrected. Once again, evolution is, scientifically speaking, the prevailing theory of biodiversity. In ordinary parlance, however, it's also a fact, since it's as well established a theory as is scientifically possible. You think you're bolstering its veracity by denying that it's a theory, but you're not. To say that it's not a scientific theory is to say that it lacks the necessary characteristics of a scientific theory, i.e., that it lacks falsifiability. Falsifiability just means that, were it false, it would be a simple matter to disprove it with evidence that can be acquired via scientific discovery or experimentation. Evolution theory meets that standard. Stop denying it's a theory. It just tells the informed that you don't know what that word means. You may want to believe that you have 'corrected' my use of the word fact, and given your faith based position, that's understandable. But you are wrong. Evolution is both fact and theory for the given reasons. Reasons and evidence that have been provided numerous times, only to be ignored. Preferring faith to reason and evidence, you refuse to accept the truth.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,640
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,640 |
If there are 'no reservations about its truth,' evolution is a fact. "No reservations" means beyond all reasonable doubt, ie, factual: a fact.
There are "no reservations" as to the reality of evolution. Let’s see how you arrived at that: ”Many people learned in elementary school that a theory falls in the middle of a hierarchy of certainty—above a mere hypothesis but below a law. Scientists do not use the terms that way, however. According to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a scientific theory is “a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses.” No amount of validation changes a theory into a law, which is a descriptive generalization about nature. So when scientists talk about the theory of evolution—or the atomic theory or the theory of relativity, for that matter—they are not expressing reservations about its truth.'' I believe you misinterpreted this. Not expressing reservations on a topic is not the same thing as claiming the opposite is true. If the intent was to claim its accepted as true, this would have been more direct in saying so. It’s actually supported in the below statement: ”'In addition to the theory of evolution, meaning the idea of descent with modification, one may also speak of the fact of evolution. The NAS defines a fact as “an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as ‘true.’” The fossil record and abundant other evidence testify that organisms have evolved through time. Although no one observed those transformations, the indirect evidence is clear, unambiguous and compelling.'' It’s carefully crafted and the bias is restrained, but it is apparent. The writer implies evolution as a fact, but falls short of openly stating it. I appreciate that he/she defines “fact” and utilizes the term “evidence” instead of “proof”. You are playing the semantic shuffle. It can be pointed out how and why evolution is a fact in several ways. It has been explained in a number of ways. But none of these ways can be acceptable for those who prefer faith. How else is creationism to be defended except through semantics and denial? Anybody who considers the evidence for evolution objectively can see it's reality, that evolution, well beyond all reasonable doubt, is a fact.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,673
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,673 |
Evolution is both fact and theory for the given reasons. Reasons and evidence that have been provided numerous times, only to be ignored.
Preferring faith to reason and evidence, you refuse to accept the truth.
It was you who said it wasn't a theory, which shows you don't know what the word means.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,640
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,640 |
I'll try to quote, Ben Stein, "Science brought us the Holocaust."
Another quote, :God is love". Neither is true.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690
Campfire Oracle
|
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690 |
I'll try to quote, Ben Stein, "Science brought us the Holocaust."
Another quote, :God is love". Neither is true. So says lying you.
Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690
Campfire Oracle
|
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,690 |
[quote=DBT]
Evolution is both fact and theory for the given reasons. Reasons and evidence that have been provided numerous times, only to be ignored.
Preferring faith to reason and evidence, you refuse to accept the truth. The truth will set you free, and you arent, DBT.
Last edited by jaguartx; 07/09/20.
Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,824
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,824 |
We have some hard hearts here
These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o
"May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,640
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,640 |
Evolution is both fact and theory for the given reasons. Reasons and evidence that have been provided numerous times, only to be ignored.
Preferring faith to reason and evidence, you refuse to accept the truth.
It was you who said it wasn't a theory, which shows you don't know what the word means. I said that evolution is both fact and theory. Organisms adapt and evolve, and we form theories based on the evidence. Fact and theory.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300
Campfire Oracle
|
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300 |
Well...I just tuned in, without reading the thread of course...
Cause I didnt know there were six theories of evolution.....
I must be out of the loop......I only ever read Darwin's theory....
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300
Campfire Oracle
|
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300 |
According to science, we should be reverting, over the ages, back to the original first humans. we are using technology of the cell phone is not the same as knowing how the chip works. Yep, we are...dysgenics is absolutely rampant, and the gene pool is severely diluted.
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
|
580 members (1beaver_shooter, 007FJ, 12344mag, 17CalFan, 1minute, 160user, 60 invisible),
2,277
guests, and
1,390
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,943
Posts18,480,110
Members73,954
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
