|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,180
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,180 |
Someone say creedmoor?? šš
Ping pong balls for the win. Once you've wrestled everything else in life is easy. Dan Gable I keep my circle small, Iād rather have 4 quarters than 100 pennies.
Aināt easy havin pals.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,138
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,138 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,180
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,180 |
Ping pong balls for the win. Once you've wrestled everything else in life is easy. Dan Gable I keep my circle small, Iād rather have 4 quarters than 100 pennies.
Aināt easy havin pals.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,832
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,832 |
...
its no different than the concept on what they are doing with the Creedmoor every one loves so much... is it?
Actually it is different. The Creedmoor is an answer to a "geometry problem", namely how to keep the ogive/shank transition of long VLD bullets out of the case neck while having the cartridge fit in the standard 2.8" magazine. It is not about velocity gains attributed to seating a slender bullet out farther when really it's higher pressure making the numbers happen.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,542
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,542 |
240 Wby with a 1/8. I see no advantage to a 6/06. 6-06 gives you multiple options to āmakeā brass. The 240Wby is an island unto itself for me thatād be reason enough to bail on the 240. A good friend has a NULA in 240 (1:7) itās an absolute hammer w/110 A-Tips. But, it was a pain in the rump rounding up brass. Regarding the OPās original question. If youāre starting from scratch, thereās no way Iād go less than 1:7. Look @ where projectile R&D is going. Nobody is gonna be wishing for slower twists anytime soon.
Last edited by horse1; 02/27/21.
I can walk on water.......................but I do stagger a bit on alcohol.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,065
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,065 |
240 Wby with a 1/8. I see no advantage to a 6/06. 6-06 gives you multiple options to āmakeā brass. The 240Wby is an island unto itself for me thatād be reason enough to bail on the 240. A good friend has a NULA in 240 (1:7) itās an absolute hammer w/110 A-Tips. But, it was a pain in the rump rounding up brass. Regarding the OPās original question. If youāre starting from scratch, thereās no way Iād go less than 1:7. Look @ where projectile R&D is going. Nobody is gonna be wishing for slower twists anytime soon. Whole heartedly agree with your comment on 6-06 brass. Rounding up 240 brass, while definitely more expensive, isn't terribly difficult to do though....unless you don't have internet access. I've never had a problem finding brass for my 240.
|
|
|
|
123 members (007FJ, 44mc, 808outdoors, 7887mm08, 35, 10Glocks, 9 invisible),
1,320
guests, and
822
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,868
Posts18,478,692
Members73,947
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|