Anybody who took the shot is part of the problem. You fell for a damned scam and took an unnecessary and potentially harmful shot. Now the government is coming for those who didn’t. If you had stood firm, the numbers would be such that government could not even be contemplating this.
For all the big talk on here about the 2nd Amendment, you old phuques didn’t even have the sense enough to let them not stick you with an experimental poison. Now, you’ll talk big about being against mandates and you’ll say that “someday, somebody, is going to do something really bad” and that is when we’ll be so glad we have our 2nd amendment. But you won’t do anything and even if you did, you already gave up the game months ago when you didn’t have sense enough to see what was coming, or if you did, you were too weak and cowardly to resist it.
Big talk? Your argument falls apart if the jab actually helps prevent serious illness, hospitalization and death. Do you really know that it does not do that? Or is your talk about "scam", and "unnecessary" just big talk?
Now watch me get crucified for not being anti-covtard and buying all the big talk from the campfire oracles. I have not made a pro-jab statement. I will not submit to bullies either.
Anybody who took the shot is part of the problem. You fell for a damned scam and took an unnecessary and potentially harmful shot. Now the government is coming for those who didn’t. If you had stood firm, the numbers would be such that government could not even be contemplating this.
For all the big talk on here about the 2nd Amendment, you old phuques didn’t even have the sense enough to let them not stick you with an experimental poison. Now, you’ll talk big about being against mandates and you’ll say that “someday, somebody, is going to do something really bad” and that is when we’ll be so glad we have our 2nd amendment. But you won’t do anything and even if you did, you already gave up the game months ago when you didn’t have sense enough to see what was coming, or if you did, you were too weak and cowardly to resist it.
Big talk? Your argument falls apart if the jab actually helps prevent serious illness, hospitalization and death. Do you really know that it does not do that? Or is your talk about "scam", and "unnecessary" just big talk?
Now watch me get crucified for not being anti-covtard and buying all the big talk from the campfire oracles. I have not made a pro-jab statement. I will not submit to bullies either.
I do not believe it helps at all. Further, I think it is very harmful.
Anybody who took the shot is part of the problem. You fell for a damned scam and took an unnecessary and potentially harmful shot. Now the government is coming for those who didn’t. If you had stood firm, the numbers would be such that government could not even be contemplating this.
I do not believe it helps at all. Further, I think it is very harmful.
I see no reason to trust any of these people.
That's a fair answer, but aren't you trying to impose your belief on others who might believe differently, when you say that they're part of the problem? You blamed them for falling for a scam and causing others to be harmed. If it's not the scam you believe it is, then you're mistaken.
I can't tell you whom, among "these people" you should beleve. It's not my place to do so. I can see, however, that you've chosen to believe some of them and to disbelieve others. What is it that makes your choice better than others? Are you so confident in your choice of whom to believe that you're willing to condemn those who think otherwise with hate and vitriol and blame? If so, what is it that makes you so confident?
It's rational to be uncertain where trust has been eroded. It is not rational to be convinced of the opposite of anything untrustworthy. Such a one could easily be manipulated. You'll simply believe the opposite of whatever the person you don't trust is saying. They could get you to believe anything, advocate anything, and be convinced of anything they wanted.
I do not believe it helps at all. Further, I think it is very harmful.
I see no reason to trust any of these people.
That's a fair answer, but aren't you trying to impose your belief on others who might believe differently, when you say that they're part of the problem? You blamed them for falling for a scam and causing others to be harmed. If it's not the scam you believe it is, then you're mistaken.
I can't tell you whom, among "these people" you should beleve. It's not my place to do so. I can see, however, that you've chosen to believe some of them and to disbelieve others. What is it that makes your choice better than others? Are you so confident in your choice of whom to believe that you're willing to condemn those who think otherwise with hate and vitriol and blame? If so, what is it that makes you so confident?
It's rational to be uncertain where trust has been eroded. It is not rational to be convinced of the opposite of anything untrustworthy. Such a one could easily be manipulated. You'll simply believe the opposite of whatever the person you don't trust is saying. They could get you to believe anything, advocate anything, and be convinced of anything they wanted.
Please, quit the sophomoric sophistry. I’m free to condemn whomever I like for whatever reasons I like. And, yes, I’m right and I’m secure enough to be certain about. I’ll not pretend to be uncertain about it in some nod to some false sense of modesty or some transparent attempt to seem more intellectual. I’m right on this. Anyone who thinks differently is wrong. It’s that simple. I don’t have a problem saying it.
So getting the jab guarantees no hospitalization ? Dr Faucci said so. so must be true
Originally Posted by Western_Juniper
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Anybody who took the shot is part of the problem. You fell for a damned scam and took an unnecessary and potentially harmful shot. Now the government is coming for those who didn’t. If you had stood firm, the numbers would be such that government could not even be contemplating this.
For all the big talk on here about the 2nd Amendment, you old phuques didn’t even have the sense enough to let them not stick you with an experimental poison. Now, you’ll talk big about being against mandates and you’ll say that “someday, somebody, is going to do something really bad” and that is when we’ll be so glad we have our 2nd amendment. But you won’t do anything and even if you did, you already gave up the game months ago when you didn’t have sense enough to see what was coming, or if you did, you were too weak and cowardly to resist it.
Big talk? Your argument falls apart if the jab actually helps prevent serious illness, hospitalization and death. Do you really know that it does not do that? Or is your talk about "scam", and "unnecessary" just big talk?
Now watch me get crucified for not being anti-covtard and buying all the big talk from the campfire oracles. I have not made a pro-jab statement. I will not submit to bullies either.
A person who takes the jab to keep a job is faulted and part of the problem as well! United we stand, divided we fall.
I actually hold that person in more contempt than someone who sincerely thought it was a good idea to take the jab.
That’s the whole point. This board is full of people who talk about the importance of the 2nd amendment, yet they don’t have the fortitude to resist merely taking a shot. It really doesn’t matter what sort of weaponry they have, they’d give it all up the first meal they missed.
A person who takes the jab to keep a job is faulted and part of the problem as well! United we stand, divided we fall.
I actually hold that person in more contempt than someone who sincerely thought it was a good idea to take the jab.
That’s the whole point. This board is full of people who talk about the importance of the 2nd amendment, yet they don’t have the fortitude to resist merely taking a shot. It really doesn’t matter what sort of weaponry they have, they’d give it all up the first meal they missed.
I agree. If a person made the decision to take it free of coercion, then I can respect that. Yep I watched people around me who touted molon labe ect....cave and get the shot. Very disappointing. Trudge on
Mass jabbing with a non-sterilizing, leaky "vaccine" (vaccine only under the new CDC definition made just for this time) forces the virus to mutate more.
I think that is a part of the problem.
A perhaps greater issue is the lack of emphasis (even sabotage) regarding early treatment and proper supplementation.
No government in their right mind would disregard long-known beneficial actions as was done the past 18+ months.
Unless they wanted a body count.
USMC 0351
We know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
![[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]](https://media.giphy.com/media/fv6n4cSgsLPk8Wzfxb/giphy.gif)
![[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]](https://media.giphy.com/media/AiFlZ0hOWa4JVPpFOA/giphy.gif)
