Crying Karen Professional Victim Insecurities,are never not funnier than fhuqk. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..............
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
many years ago, Stick was fan of the 6x42 leupold, IIRC, mounted on a slicked-up remington 700 in 280 AI, macmillan stock. kind of a recipe for an all-weather medium/big game hunting rifle; as i was on a tight budget,i cobbled a semi copy with a bedded ADL in .270 winchester and a nikon 6x42 and worked trigger; perfect for mid-long alabama deer hunting; a fine recipe indeed. but things change: some optics companies improve, some go downhill; some firearms companies go downhill, better ones appear; bullets improve. so here we are, and Stick has different opinions ...
I remember decades ago , all gold rings at my gun club. It was standard operating procedure to make an adjustment, then tap the erector. Then hope it tracked.
Thankfully times have changed.
Decades of voting for the lesser of two evils has gotten us just that.....
Troll is still working on his scrub buck total to get halfway to the number of points you have in that picture. Damn nice bucks
Your right you know. You really can see they guys who do in this thread verses the guys that can’t. It’s hard to argue with the point count! You have to hand it to Tasco though, they’ve run a hell of a gorilla marketing campaign until people started to catch on!
Troll is still working on his scrub buck total to get halfway to the number of points you have in that picture. Damn nice bucks
Your right you know. You really can see they guys who do in this thread verses the guys that can’t. It’s hard to argue with the point count! You have to hand it to Tasco though, they’ve run a hell of a gorilla marketing campaign until people started to catch on!
I had a short section that offered rear support but that is no longer made.
yea, that figures they would drop the most useful part. thank you
The government plans these shootings by targeting kids from kindergarten that the government thinks they can control with drugs until the appropriate time--DerbyDude
Whatever. Tell the oompa loompa's hey for me. [/quote]. LtPPowell
Sorry to bust your bubble friend, I’ve been reading these forums since before it ever migrated to 24hr campfire, back when Sonny and BCR where staples, and BS was very helpful. I don’t mind saying he even started me on the blue bullets way back when. It sad to see how far it’s fallen.
Wait? Tim Kennedy works with Leupold? Not a good look.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
I enjoy what Squirm's "thinks" is "good" work at 550yds with a Reupold,is done easily with a 22LR Rimfire and a good scope. Hint.
Only fair to fuel her Teenage Fetish Fantasies too. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...................
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
Do you trust that static testing tells you all you need to know about how well your scope is going to perform with other variables, or do you take it out to confirm by shooting?
That was never typed by Rick and you seem to understand that testing the optic is the first step with shooting/field use being the second.
Much of this thread is a result of the OPs and others lack of experience reading trace and spotting impacts.
The Elk video is a great test if someone has the basics of LR shooting. A few very vocal fail Bots and lots pass in the thread.
If a LiL Fish or a Shrappy Baldwin or a Jackoffmt can't read trace and spot impacts watching HD video frame by frame why would anyone listen to their advice on optics.
Always wrong but never in doubt posters is part of the 24HR CF.
Do you trust that static testing tells you all you need to know about how well your scope is going to perform with other variables, or do you take it out to confirm by shooting?
That was never typed by Rick and you seem to understand that testing the optic is the first step with shooting/field use being the second. Much of this thread is a result of the OPs and others lack of experience reading trace and spotting impacts. The Elk video is a great test if someone has the basics of LR shooting. A few very vocal fail Bots and lots pass in the thread. If a LiL Fish or a Shrappy Baldwin or a Jackoffmt can't read trace and spot impacts watching HD video frame by frame why would anyone listen to their advice on optics. Always wrong but never in doubt posters is part of the 24HR CF.
JB:
To clear up confusion, RC did ask if I thought mounting a scope and then going out and shooting actually proved anything. This was followed by a question from RC of if I just trusted the manufacturer. Based on these statements, as a logical retort in the line of questioning, I asked the question you quoted.
Rick was already on record about that but maybe you missed his posts.
Point is that if a shooter has access to a static test setup it's smart to test the optic before spending rounds.
We test everything on a collimator for reticle level, adjustments in both increment and range, zoom and focus run out, and reticle substension before shooting.
Leupold Virtues.
When was the last time you saw a “straight” man with so many pics of other dudes on his phone?
And how many are <18????
Originally Posted by shrapnel
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
I want to apologize to Mr Burns. I watched the video on my IPhone and going by what his spotter commented made a judgement.
I have not watched the video on a big screen in slow motion but several have and state that all 3 shots hit the animal.
Great Bull
All good.
The video is very useful for sifting wheat from chaff.
Self proclaimed LR shooters, like LiL Fish or Shrappy Baldin, who can't read trace or impact are not the best source for optic selection.
It always starts and end the same way when I post that video and helps newer guys to sort out talkers from those with real world experience.
Visual persuasion is the most lasting.
Leupold Virtues.
You couldn’t even separate the wheat from the chaff when choosing a spotter in that vid you posted which is what started the whole thing you idiot. “In the head…. In the antler, right in the head.”
I want to apologize to Mr Burns. I watched the video on my IPhone and going by what his spotter commented made a judgement.
I have not watched the video on a big screen in slow motion but several have and state that all 3 shots hit the animal.
Great Bull
1 down ^^^^^, how many to go?
LOL
I would think you have a lot more Important scheit to be concerned about than what’s going on in the optics forum with being about to be stripped of your rights to defend yourself. Big surprise, the state that doesn’t trust you to pump your own Fugkin gas doesn’t trust you with more than 10 rds at a time, and then, only in your own home.