Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Victim, really? (22 y.o. asst. cheerleading coach has sex with 17 y.o. student)

Well they did say she wasn't married..........that usually cures that.

Before I said "suppose it was YOUR kid.

Now I can say "suppose it was YOUR daughter"....


I mean I'm sure the coach, in a position of authority and trusted and admired by that naive and maybe confused teenager and all, had that 17 year old girl's best interests in mind, right?

And hey, like folks here said, if they are both of legal age, whats the problem?

Birdwatcher

I just assumed that's what GoLSU was getting at.

I stand by what I said.

Me too.

Sometimes it's just too easy around here.
All basketball players at the subject school (girls AND boys) are white.

It's unclear as to the victim's gender.

The Fox report states


44henry's link states:




What if it is a 17 year old male and he was the aggressor?

The 17 year old male reported that she had the whitest teeth he had ever come across...



John

Now I understand why the 17 year old male is a victim: after having had wonderful sex with this wholesome young beauty, he has been left with a sense of deprivation and needs to cover the routine again and again.

She should be condemned to a year of weekly performance with the young male at a supermarket parking of his choice. Thus the victim will be fully and justly compensated.

Lucky for him she didn't!

........so many rules, in fact, that it's virtually impossible not to break one every other hour or so...

You mean lucky little BITCH. It was a GIRL student. She's a queer.

from the article:

Just keep this in mind the next time you guys hear of a young male teacher or coach bangin' a 17 year old hottie.

It was not "the school parking lot" but a supermarket's parking lot.


Oh well Thats much better!

17 and 22?
The victim here?
ME!
I didn't get to watch!

Think about the 'Sandusky is a monster' thread. What's the difference? You have an assistant coach queering it with a student. I suspect that Sandusky started at a young age, too. He used his position of authority to lure young boys to satisfy his queer cravings. Now you have a young female assistant coach luring young girls to satisfy her queer cravings. What's the difference?

Everyone here wanted to castrate Sandusky with a butter knife but now some want to give the woman a medal? What's the difference?

That poor poor boy.

Heard it reported both ways now, male and female student.

Never underestimate the effect of freely avaialble internet porn on teenagers.

The 17 yo, if a girl, might be an-in-your-face confirmed lesbian, this occurs at the middle school level now.

Or she coulda been confused and conflicted, all her friends telling her to be lesbian or "bi" was the cool and fun thing to do, like in those porn clips.

Either way, I'm guessing the student was a girl. I mean, ain't many guys gonna go to the Cops about an attractive woman going down on them.

If the 17 yo was already a hard-core lesbian, she probl'y got mad at the coach and turned her in out of pure spite.

If she was conflicted/confused, I'd guess she suddenly woke up the fact of what really had been done to her.

Birdwatcher

Depending on the laws in that state, this is a case of custodial sexual assault/misconduct. Any time someone is considered a custodial agent based on their position and ability to effect someone due to their position, sexual relationships can not be deemed consensual.

In some states, like California, this may not have been illegal. In my state, Washington, it is illegal.

The victim was male...

Unless her lawyer is wrong.

The story has changed. I earlier quoted an article that said the victim was a girl. Now Foxnews is saying it's a boy. Maybe a happy threesome?

Did we find out if he was a negro or not?