Where you and I disagree is that you consider his orders against general dissemination of classified information unlawful; I don't.
I'm sure they were perfectly lawful, in the typical government sense of the word, although I'd prefer to use the term "legal." (I recognize a big difference between natural law and human legislation.)
But I don't give a rip whether things are that kind of lawful or not: I care whether they're right or wrong.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain--that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." --Lysander Spooner, 1867
