I just laugh at TRH. We have a guy on Russian TV talking about the expense of fracing a well, a small but needed part of the well. Just laugh cause it doesn't matter what the answer is he will find something that doesn't meet his standard.
I'm not sure what you're not understanding. I already know the process is
technologically feasible. It's been proven that for decades. I'm not, therefore, looking for explanations of the
process.
Keiser made an argument based on
economics. If you don't have a refutation of
that argument, there's no reason for you to respond to this thread. Not to say you
can't. Just that any other kind of response will be
off-point.
So far, there's been one on-point response, but even he admitted that it fell short of a
refutation, but made a very good explanation as to why.
