We have a lot of fun with typos and omissions sometimes. It takes a bit of a mental midget to jump on one or two and make that a point of discussion "proving the writer incorrect", when the meaning is clear to all who actually try to read it and understand the point at hand (and I'm sure I've been guilty of such midgetry a time or two).
Takes the same kind of person to infer from a list of guns that a 'smith chooses not to work on that they are all somehow inferior. In the face of JOG's explanation of said list, that has to be a special sort of someone.
BTW - nice pistola, Dan.
