Originally Posted by Zerk
Originally Posted by MuskegMan

Originally Posted by Zerk
Does not explain why they are better. .


Wow - it's been explained to you twice now on this very thread.

I can only lead the horse to water . . .

Pretty much said its better and you are retard for questioning.

I am not convinced it could so far out of whack in the pic, but the points would not show.

I asked for an article, not some guys opinion on a forum. You google how to use scope alignment rods, it doesn't agree. Maybe there is some new way to do it. Maybe either is as good as the other, Maybe doing both would be best.

But bringing two halves to fine point, seems pretty good. The axis of the rod and gun will align with the point. Which is the point of the whole thing.


But I guess you are smarter than the people who make them, and your arguement is cause we said so.



WTF do you think they bother pointing a point on it? Would be cheaper to make without it.



You have been here for just a little over a month and you have 455 posts. Perhaps it is time that you pay less attention to your keyboard and more attention to your screen.

It could be that the reason the "people who make them"...make them with both a flat and pointed end...is so one can use either. The world in which we all live is not always binary.