Originally Posted by Snyper
I think you're confused.


You're thinkin again, in site of past results.

Mathews was the camel's nose in the tent of liberty.

It decided that a person's money benefits could be taken before a full court hearing, as long as there was a process in place that guaranteed a court hearing at a date in the future.

That ruling was perverted into the "process" for ex parte protection orders, which haven't been overturned by the Supremes or anybody else.

IDK how long it's been, but at least 20 years since the EP crap began, and the Supremes haven't taken a case about it.

State courts have upheld it.

And the ex parte procedure was adopted by the Red Flag crowd, doin a different thing, in the same way.