If a man is deemed a threat to society and they remove his firearms just what have they accomplished?
If only his firearms are removed is he not still a threat?
These recent shooters were all described as angry. Will a potential threat not be more enraged after his property is taken away?
The gun is a tool. The gun is not the threat in this instance, so what is accomplished by only removing the tool? Wont the "threat" simply choose a different tool and perhaps be even more motivated to use it?
Once again the real motivation in all of this is gun control and their elimination. Public safety is NOT the true goal.
