You have some demented agenda.
Your first spurious claim was this post on this very thread.
There has got to be more to the story. But I will say this, if there isn’t, the courts aren’t to blame, your peers are. This was a jury decision. That means that 11 people you share the streets with everyday heard this case and decided the way that they did.
You then create another thread about this topic and start it with falsehoods that were nothing more than someones opinion that was exposed as fake news.
You then spend most of yesterday defending your lies.
From a juror on the Texas transgender child custody caseNow this post today which is another lie.
As I understand it, it is on hold now and she will not be able to precede at this time.
Only until the Texas State attorney general,U.S. senator Cruz and finally the governor of Texas express an interest in this case,did the goofy-ass judge decide to allow the father his rights.
So what is your agenda? Do you have a member of your family that is mentally afflicted with gender Dysphoria and you're attempting to defend or excuse it?
Why don't you come clean and stop lying.
You’re literally dumber than schit.
First of all, you should be thankful that the judge has some sense. Second of all, there is nothing that the governor, the attorney general, or Senator Cruz can do to a district judge in Texas. Thirdly, THE FATHER ASKED FOR A JURY TRIAL. He wasn’t forced to a jury trial, HE ASKED FOR IT. And no, despite all the fricking fake news, the jury NEVER ruled that mom could proceed with medical treatment without the father’s consent. They gave her sole managing conservatorship but the judge was ALWAYS going to get to make the conditions about any medical treatment.
Now what actually happened is actually better than that even. Joint managing conservatorship is the default position in Texas. In order for someone to get sole managing conservatorship, a number of conditions must be proved. A motion was made by the father’s counsel and the judge apparently ruled that jury had erred in its determination and concluded something not supported by the evidence as presented.
I’ve said since I heard about this case that no court in Texas was going to let a mom force a seven year old into a sex change, and it didn’t. Now, in my opinion the court could have gone farther and restricted mom’s visitation.
I wonder if the child had an ad litem or amicus attorney and if there was any court ordered evaluation by a neutral psychologist.
