Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by cooper57m
Originally Posted by TheLastLemming76
Originally Posted by cooper57m
Originally Posted by steve4102
The neighbors heard it, if they heard it he heard it, so says the GJ


Then why did the GJ decide not to indict Mr. Walker for shooting the policeman? If the GJ thought that Mr. Walker knew it was the police that broke into his house (and why were the police in plain clothes?) why didn't they indict him with attempted murder. They must have believed him when he stated he didn't know it was the police. The assumption that because someone else heard something that means others must have heard it too is ludicrous.

It’s the political climate dumbazz


If it's the political climate dumbazz, then why didn't the GJ indict the officers on more serious charges? Dumbazz!


It’s the political climate. Same reason they havent indicted other perps.

They dont want to wrongly file on the cops as it would lead to trials and each aquittal would result in the same pillaging all over again.

Exactly right. He’s trying to thread the needle of charging someone with something to give the rioters a little red meat while being careful to keep it minor enough to get a conviction or plea deal. Wildly make up charges against them and watch it all burn again when they go to court and get acquitted.
It’s really easy to understand and all politically motivated. I can see how it could be difficult to understand what is going on to someone dumb enough to live in NY with there 10 round mags and dumbazz looking AR’s to comply with the bans along with all the other regs.