Remington does own Dakota pending sale including the FFL as located in Sturgis. The term occurs a dozen times in the Court document, referenced elsewhere in this thread including South Dakota water issues.
There are references in the Court document that might or might not - I haven't made a close study and if anybody cares I encourage them to do their own reading and research 1498 searchable pages - mention the disposition of Dakota including a suggestion that if anybody who didn't buy it ends up with pieces of Dakota the person in possession owes that piece to the buyer, at least I think it can be read that way. Disentangling Dakota and the Remington Custom Shop will be difficult and I suppose expensive.
