Not guilty and the jury should agree. That being said, not sure about the merit of a 17YO walking around armed in a powder keg of a situation.
The adults didn't seem to have the balls to do the right thing.... including the ones paid to do the right thing. So by your standard a 17 yr old doesn't have the right to defend himself? WTF is wrong with you?
Exactly right.
His merit was exactly right. Where he got it wrong was thinking that grown men would be there with the same courage and love of country that he had. The kid literally was scrubbing graffiti off walls and wanted to go into law enforcement for all of the right reasons. The same reasons the left is doing all they can to make sure that kids like him won’t or can’t.
No kidding.
Now they're finding better quality video from the drone than what was submitted by the prosecution. And the jump kicker has just now been mysteriously identified, when the prosecution knew who he was all along. IMHO, the big lady at the defense should get a free shot at slapping the wimp judge's face around to the other side of his head. What a Schifftshow.
Similar to the judge in the OJ case. Guys that go into that line of work have limited real life experience. They mostly went straight out of HS being spoon fed to a BA degree and then straight to law school. They graduate at 25 with virtually no work experience or any meaningful hard work or life experiences and start angling for careers as politicians or judges thinking that they know best.
