I don't know if this has already been discussed in this thread - I admit I haven't read every post - but there are some simple (and not so simple) issues in play here.
In 2014, there was a violent coup in Ukraine. The President of the country fled and a very pro-USA government was installed. Some people say the US was behind it every step of the way, others say it was a popular revolution. I think what you call it is less important than the outcome.
That outcome - and you should read all that you can about it and decide for yourselves - lead to some very important changes: the US got "friends" in Ukraine who would support putting US nuclear missiles right on the Russian border (a 10 minute flight from their biggest population centers), and Russia had to start paying millions (billions?) of dollars a year to transport their gas across Ukraine to their customers in Europe. And not inconsequentially, some US children of important US politicians got some very high-paying jobs with Ukrainian businesses that profited from the new political situation. Does anyone actually think the CIA was NOT involved in this somehow?
To say the least, Russia was highly displeased with this new development. Not to mention a LOT of the Ukrainian people who have strong ties to Russia, family in Russia, speak Russian and don't like the new political leadership. Are they a majority? Do they outnumber the pro-U.S. faction? I don't know, but they exist. And when Russian tanks roll across Ukraine, those people are not going to stand in their way.
Russia gains a LOT from invading Ukraine - access to the Black Sea for shipping, freedom from the threat of US missiles on their border and no more exorbitant payments to move their gas to customers in Europe. Not to mention the opportunity to spit in the eye of that idiot Biden, who publicly declared that if Putin did not invade, it was only because he was afraid of the US president.
I personally don't think Putin will go any farther, but what do I know? I can only say it doesn't appear there is a strong cost/benefit ratio to support further aggression. On the other hand, NATO is certainly a paper tiger, and the US would have a really difficult time justifying a full-scale war against Russia even if they did send their tanks into some small NATO country like Lithuania.
History is unfolding.
On the surface, what you say is spot on, but still waters run deep.
All the schiett you describe above was to help the NWO get control over and subdue Putin by our already corrupted and mostly subdued US, making the dastardly deed of the satanic Bolsheviks look good on paper to the world and pushed on an unsuspecting world from behind the scenes by the POS MSM.
Things were not good, as they appeared to be, until after the truths started to be revealed about Americas dark underbelly by investigations after the 2020 election.
Putin and the Military Intel and Trump knew what scum the worlds WEF and Cabal were all along.
We knew the UN pukes weren't worth a schiett, we just didnt know the extent of the Bolshevik scum in our government.
We started wondering WTF was going on after Zero won his second term. Thank GOD military Intel knew what the NWO cabal had in store for us the Hillary half of their 16 year plan after Zero and talked Trump into running to try to prevent the bloody revolution and they succeeded in blocking the steal in 2016 and got trump in to work out the plan developed over many decades subsequent to the deep states assassination of JFK.
We are being led from dark to light.
