Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tarquin
If the facts she described are true then that's very bad for Trump. Question is whether Meadows and Cippolone will waive executive privilege to rebut her. If she is lying you would expect them to waive and rebut.
Her lies have already been discredited by witnesses to the events.

If true, great, but I've not read that and the article suggests otherwise. Do you have a source?

National Review

That would be a good start. They also need to rebut her claim that Trump said he knew they were armed but wanted the metal detectors taken down nonetheless. Potentially, that is very damning. This is where I come back to my basic complaint about DJT: stupid, egomaniacal mother effer. JFC! There is a lot more at stake (MAGA) than his damned ego needs. mad

Tarquin