Originally Posted by STRSWilson
Originally Posted by memtb
Originally Posted by STRSWilson
So if Liz lost in a landslide, then there was no election fraud? Right?

Hard to follow when there is election fraud and where there isn't.


Please “clearly” explain the meaning of your post! I would hate to be incorrect about my immediate evaluation of you! Thanks! memtb

The point is, the term 'election fraud" is about as mentally sound as the term "racist". No matter who wins or loses it had to be because of election fraud - ballot dumping, Dominion systems (gasp), or voter suppression. Seems the term has become the favorite dog whistle of the extremists regardless of party affiliation.

For us mere bystanders, it's all a little confusing.

Dems rejected nearly 30% of the signatures to recall a radical Democrat in California, then expect people to believe < 1% of mail-in ballots in a general election are invalid?


“Factio democratica delenda est"