I don't want to be nasty, but this "explanation" was nothing but a word salad. It's complete nonsense.
'Nuff said, as the saying goes.
Considering an ffp Scope has fewer lenses, it’s only obvious that the reverse of his statement would be true. Some guys will argue that water is dry though.
Where did you get the idea that an FFP has fewer lenses than the equivalent SFP?
